Thinking, Guessing, and Believing

This paper defends the view, put roughly, that to think p is guess answer question at hand, and rationally for one’s be (in a certain sense) non-arbitrary. Some theses will argued along way include: thinking question-sensitive and, correspondingly, ‘thinks’ context-sensitive; it can rational while having arbitrarily low credence p; that, nonetheless, closed under entailment; does not supervene on credence; in many cases what one thinks matters is, very literal sense, choice. Finally, since there are strong reasons believe just believing, each of these claims true belief as well.